|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cartridge Overall Length (Seating Depth)General IntroductionThe overall length of the cartridge is a very important detail. That’s why handloading manuals list the overall length (seating depth) for every different bullet. Overall length affects gun function and safety. If the bullet is seated too long, the cartridge might get stuck in the magazine. Or the cartridge might jam during feeding because the bullet engages the riflings before the case is far enough in the chamber. This will prevent the slide from going all the way forward and the gun won't fire. If the cartridge is too short it can cause feeding failures if the point of the cartridge nose-dives and hits the feed ramp lower than usual and at a sharper angle. Seating depth also affects pressure. The deeper the bullet, the higher the pressure. Normally this is balanced with a gunpowder charge appropriate for the bullet weight and seating depth. But when the cartridge is loaded to maximum pressure, and the bullet is seated significantly deeper than it should be, a dramatic increase in pressure can skyrocket to dangerous levels and this risks the chance of a case blowout, or worse. When loading any cartridge, the golden rule is: not too long, not too short. Generally speaking, the length of the loaded round should be as long as possible to enhance feeding reliability, but not so long that it jams in the magazine or in the chamber. And the bullet should not be seated so deep that it hampers feeding reliability or pushes pressure to high. In order to spare the casual reader from wading through all my data to get the simple answer, I'm going to begin this section with recommended cartridge overall lengths with common bullet shapes. These are shown in Table 1. The brief explanation is that flat nose bullets (like hollow point bullets) generally have to be seated deeper than round nose bullets in order to fit in the magazine. The Sierra jacketed hollow point bullets must be seated especially deep because of their unique design in order to fit in the typical 38 Super chamber. If you want a better understanding of why seating depth is different for different bullets shapes, read the rest of this page. Table 1: Suggested Overall Length (Seating Depth) with Round Nose and Flat Nose Bullets in the 38 Super
* 1.280 inches is the maximum overall length for the 38 Super cartridge. JHP = Jacketed Hollow Point. ** You have to test the proper length for your gun's chamber. To do this, remove the barrel from your gun. Load a single cartridge rather long, say 1.250. Drop it in the chamber to see if it goes all the way in and if it engages the riflings (it gets stuck). If it does, seat the bullet deeper and continue this test until the cartridge goes all the way in the chamber and does not get stuck. Then measure and record this length. Different barrels might have different tolerances for the Sierra and other bullets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seating Depth and Bullet ShapeThe Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute, Inc. (SAAMI) established maximum overall length for the 38 Super is set at 1.280 inches. It’s not unreasonable to expect gun manufacturers to design their magazines around this established standard. Ammunition manufacturers also design their product around this standard and don't load ammo longer than the maximum length. The overall length of factory 38 Super ammunition can be found here on this website. The longest overall length of the factory ammunition that I measured was the Federal load at 1.271 inches. These are average lengths so you can imagine that some individual rounds were a bit closer to maximum length. Other loadings were not far behind in length. Round nose bullets can be seated to the maximun length and will (or at least should) fit and feed in all magazines. However, flat nose bullets like hollow point bullets generally must be seated deeper in order to fit in the magazine. Why do different bullets types require different seating depths? #1. The front surface of the magazine is round. #2. Cartridges sit in the magazine at an angle. Lets look at each of these in some detail. #1. The front surface of the magazine is round. This is obvious for single column magazines. Many double column magazines have a flat front surface, but the edges are round. Round nose bullets fit well in the round contour and don’t need much clearance to function perfectly. But this round contour does not as readily accommodate flat nose bullets such as hollow point and truncated designs. If the front of the magazine was square, then the bullet shape would not matter. But it’s not square, it’s round. Remember the saying about Do flat nose bullets rub on the round edge of a double #2. Cartridges sit in the magazine at an angle. Figure 2 shows a side view of the magazine. The cartridge is canted, and lies at an angle of 68 degrees (in the 1911 single column magazines that were measured). (It turns out that the angle changes as more cartridges are added, and this is explained in more detail below). Note also that only an edge of the cartridge rim contacts the back wall. Because the cartridge is at an angle, you have to take the diagonal length of the cartridge into account because it’s this length that has to fit in the magazine.
Because cartridges sit at an angle, the nose of flat nose bullets acquires a somewhat rounded profile, and they don't look exactly like is shown in Figure 1. But the bullet's angle does not transform it to a simple round nose like a real round nose bullet. This is illustrated in Figure 3. You'll note that the edges of the flat nose still protrude beyond the profile of a normal round nose design. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diagonal LengthThe diagonal length of a cartridge loaded with flat nose bullets is longer than a cartridge loaded with round nose bullets when they are seated to the same depth. This is illustrated in Figure 4.
Flat Nose Bullets. Cartridges with flat point bullets gain between 0.027 and 0.031 inches in diagonal length. A 38 Super round loaded to 1.280 inches with a flat nose bullet has an overall diagonal length between 1.307 and 1.311 inches. Bullets with a broader flat nose profile have a longer diagonal length. That’s because the edge of the flat nose is farther from the midline of the bullet. You mathematical types can refer to Pythagorean geometry to see why that's the case. (The wider the flat nose, the longer one leg of a right triangle becomes, which translates into a longer hypotenuse.) Table 2 lists some common bullets and the diagonal length of the cartridge when the bullets are loaded to an overall length of 1.280 inches. Note the diagonal length of the two Hornady XTP bullets listed. The flat nose profile of the 147 grain XTP bullet is broader than that of the 124 grain bullet. This results in a longer diagonal measurement for the 147 grain bullet. Table 2: Diagonal Length with Round Nose and Flat Nose Bullets
* Length in inches. ** Some hollow point noses have a non-circular geometric shape which results in variable diagonal length measurements depending on whether the measurement is made at the geometric point or between points. Measurements made with standard semi-rimmed 38 Super brass. With rimless brass the diagonal length increased about .003 inches less. Weight in grains. FMJ = Full Metal Jacket. GDHP = Gold Dot Hollow Point. GS BJHP = Golden Saber Brass Jacketed Hollow Point. JHP = Jacketed Hollow Point. STHP = Silver Tip Hollow Point. XTP HP = Extreme Terminal Performance Hollow Point. Hands-on Testing I empirically tested the nose profile concept. This test compared two different flat nose hollow point bullets, one with a narrow flat profile, and the other with a wide flat profile. I used a Winchester Silver Tip Hollow Point (STHP) for the narrow flat nose bullet, and a Sierra Jacketed Hollow Point (JHP) for a wide flat nose bullet (refer to Table 2 above). For this test, I loaded these bullets to an overall length that is much longer than they should be loaded. The bullets were loaded to different overall lengths. The STHP was loaded to a longer than SAAMI maximum (1.280) length of 1.285 inches and had a measured diagonal length of 1.312 inches. The Sierra bullet was seated deeper, right at the SAAMI maximum length of 1.280 inches, and had a diagonal length of 1.311 inches, which was 0.001 inches less than the STHP cartridge. These were tested in the same Colt magazine. I put the test cartridge in as the second round, then added more rounds. The first round, and the rounds put in after the test cartridge were Winchester factory hardball (FMJ) that were tested and fit the magazine with no problems. The average length of the Winchester rounds used in this test was 1.273 inches and the longest one measured 1.279 inches. The important information here is that the narrow Winchester STHP bullet was seated to an overall length longer than the wide Sierra JHP bullet. All else being equal you would predict that the longer seated STHP bullet would jam in the magazine while the shorter seated Sierra bullet would not. Right? But that wouldn’t make an interesting example, would it? Result: The result was that the shorter seated Sierra JHP bullet got stuck in the magazine, and the longer seated Winchester STHP bullet did not. After I put two rounds in on top of the Sierra test round, it jammed. The two top rounds then fell out of the magazine and the Sierra round was stuck tight. It had to be coaxed out. The narrower (longer) Silver Tip Hollow Point bullet did not jam at all and I was able to fill the magazine completely and unload it normally. I repeated the test several times and the results were the same. This simple test demonstrates that wider flat nose bullets have to be seated deeper in order to accommodate the rounded profile of the front of the magazine, which is what Figures 1 and 3 (above) are all about. Another thing I learned during this test was that there are (or can be) slight differences in the front to back width at different depths of the magazine. When I tested the Sierra bullet it jammed solid in the upper portion of the magazine. But if I forced more rounds in, pushing it deeper, it started to move freely as per normal. This was not due to pushing the bullet deeper in the case because I measured it afterwards and the cartridge's length had not changed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cartridge Fit in Magazine
A simple way to look at this is that the cartridge length cannot be greater than the shortest distance in the magazine. The shortest distance in the magazine is a straight line that intersects the front and back sides of the magazine at a 90 degree right angle (see Figure 5). The longest length of the cartridge is measured at a diagonal angle as noted above. The question is whether the longest length of the cartridge (diagonal angle) ever crosses the 90 degree angle of the magazine? After all, if the cartridge always stays at a sufficiently steep angle, it might never approach the angle of the shortest distance. We need to know 2 things. What is the angle of the cartridges in the magazine, and what is the angle of the maximum diagonal length of the cartridge? If you add these numbers and they total 90 degrees or more, then the cartridge’s longest length matches, or crosses, the angle of the shortest distance. Angle of Cartridge in the Magazine I noted above that cartridges lie in the magazine at a 68 degree angle. That’s true for the top round. Oh, and at least for the time being I’m only talking about 38 Super rounds in a single column magazine. Okay, well the 68 degree angle only applies to the top round, and it only applies when there is no more than a round or two in the magazine. As more rounds are added, the angle of the top round changes. Strange, but true. By the time a 10 round magazine is full, the angle of the top round lies at 72 degrees – a change of 4 degrees. But what is more unusual is that the angle of the rounds deeper in the magazine changes even more than the angle of the top round. When a 10 round single column magazine is full, the angle of the rounds under the top round is 78 degrees. This is a change of 10 degrees! The measurements are listed in Table 3. Table 3: Angle of Cartridges in the Magazine
Angle is relative to the back wall of the magazine as shown in Figures 2 and 6. Values represent the average angle from 7 different magazines. Magazines were Chip McCormick with factory follower and Colt with Wilson Combat follower. The brand of follower did not influence angle. NA = Not Applicable: Angle of underlying round was the same as the top round. This difference in the angle of the top round and the one immediately under it causes a substantial gap at the front of these cartridges. Look closely and you can see this in Figure 6. This gap is one of the principle causes of nose dive feed failures which is discussed in more detail here (under construction) on this web site. Angle of Longest Length So, at what angle is the loaded cartridge at its longest length? This is where I turn to math. Remember when your teachers said you would need math skills one day? This is the day. But I am going to cheat and use a calculator. I measured the width of the flat surface of hollow point bullets and derived the numbers necessary to plug into a program on the web (angle calculator) to determine the other angles of a 90 degree right triangle. If I add the Sierra's 15 degree angle to the 78 degree angle of deep cartridges in a fully loaded magazine, the combined angle equals 93 degrees. Even the narrow nosed Winchester STHP has a combined angle of 91.62 degrees. This means that the angle of the longest length of the cartridge with a flat nose bullet crosses the critical 90 degree angle of the shortest distance. This is shown in Figure 6. In fact, if you add the angle of round nose bullets (estimated 10 to 12 degrees) to the 78 degree cartridge angle and you're close to or at 90 degrees anyway. So pretty much any bullet configuration will need to fit in the shortest distance in the magazine. This means that the maximum diagonal length as measured here is relevant in determining the maximum length that will fit in the magazine. Thank goodness. I’d hate to have done all this work for nothing. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sections on this page coming in the future: Bullet shape and chambering this section is still under construction. more text and figures are in the works. patience please, i'm working as fast as i can. its my darn day job that holds me back. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| References:
Speer Reloading Manual #13. 1998. Ed. Allan Jones. Blount, Inc. Sporting Equipment Division. Speer, Lewiston, ID. ANSI/SAAMI booklet Z299.3-1993. American National Standard. Voluntary Industry Performance Standards for Pressure and Velocity of Centerfire Pistol and Revolver Ammunition for the Use of Commercial Manufacturers. 1993. Sporting Arms & Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute, Inc., Wilton, Conn. USA. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Questions, comments, suggestions, hate mail? Feel free to email me. However, the probability of getting a response is low simply because I have a day job and a life and don't have the time to respond to all emails. It's nothing personal, really. Nevertheless, I do appreciate your thoughts. If you see an obvious error then please put the word ERROR in the title of your email. Thanks, and happy shooting. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contact: dude@38super.net
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008 38 Super.net
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||